The article discusses
about the governing foundation of shari’ah authority in Malaysia, GCC Countries
and United Kingdom. It was suggested that the different countries imposed
different degree of guidelines and regulation based on their degree of shariah
implementation and business perception. The study grouped the countries into
five (5) different types of approach which are (1) reactive approach – non
Islamic legal environment such as UK and Turkey, (2) passive approach – shariah governance model and exclusively for Saudi Arabia, (3) minimalist approach –
GCC except Saudi Arabia and Oman, (4) pro-active approach - Malaysia and (5)
interventionist approach – unique for Pakistan.
In the second
section, the article discuss in details for each three regions regarding the regulatory
overview as a bird angle perspective in understanding the regulation
environment of the country. To get closer, the discussion next focus into the
shariah implementation for each region in which the country can be categorized
into regulated environment and self-regulatory environment.
In the final section,
the article highlighted the issue of regulatory. In this part the discussion
generally focus on the legal status of shariah pronouncement, the conflict of
laws, the court jurisdiction, the differences of shariah resolution and the
authority of the shariah board either executive, advisory or supervisory.
The paper
suggested :-
- That the shariah board should be given the supervisory and advisory right in addressing the shariah issues in IFI thus the members may give a full ideas and power toward the truly shariah
- That the IFIs are indeed required a complete legal framework and real shariah governance.
- To have a thorough study about the possibility in implementing AAOIFI standards and IFSB guidelines.
- The existing regulatory framework needs to further enhance and improve concurrent to the development of IFIs.
Reference
Zulkifli Hasan
(2010), Regulatory Framework of Shari’ah Governance System in Malaysia, GCC
Countries and the UK, Kyoto Bulletin of Islamic Area Studies , 3-2 (March
2010), pp. 82 -115
No comments:
Post a Comment